example-image
Connect with Us:  

Eve of Racing In Rijeka: 104 Euro Records So Far...

Dec 10, 2008  - Craig Lord

SwimNews has kept a techno tally of world records this year - 95 and counting, is the long and short of it. But as we turn our gaze towards the coastal city of Rijeka in Croatia for the last major international - the European s/c Championships - of the first year in which swimwear has contributed significantly to enhancing performance beyond expectation across an entire population of swimmers regardless of nationality or level in the sport, here are some continental stats to hold on tight to should (or when) the wave carry us on once more.

In the Olympic years of 1996, 2000 and 2004, Europe witnessed the following numbers of new continental standards:

  • 1996: Total 20 (l/c, 8; s/c 12)
  • 2000*: Total 65 (l/c, 38; s/c 27)
  • 2004: Total 14 (l/c, 5; s/c 9)

 (* - we recall that 2000 was the year that FINA gave the thumbs up to bodysuits, was challenged by Australia but was backed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport, which said that the international federation was within its rights to approve the use of the bodysuit (just as in 2008 there is nothing FINA can do to stop federations, colleges and other bodies from banning the bodysuit for use in their domestic waters and therefore rendering the FINA rule book a limp thing on the flagpole of standardisation, harmonisation and fair play). No question that 2000 was a significant year - a peak along the line of European record-setting trends.

And look what happened in 2008:

  • Total: 104
  • 67 long-course: men 36; women 31
  • 37 short course: men 20; women 17

Gosh! Wonder how that happened?

The only thing that comes close down the years is, yes, you guessed it: the GDR. We know what happened back then (lots of talent, sports science and hard work too - steroid-assisted). We also know what's happening now (lots of talent, sports science and hard work too - technology assisted).

There will be plenty of great swimming over the coming four days of racing in Rijeka as more than 500 swimmers from 40 nations line up for battle. There are a fair few notable absentees, including some Olympic champions and medal winners, such as double gold medalists Britta Steffen and Rebecca Adlington. The show will go on – and it promises to be a fast one. 

The Olympic champions of 2008 who will compete are Federica Pellegrini (ITA), Alain Bernard (FRA) and the Dutch sprint free relay quartet of Inge Dekker, Ranomi Kromowidjojo, Femke Heemskerk and Marleen Veldhuis, while Lazslo Cseh (HUN), Beijing winner of three silvers behind “the alien”, as Hungarians joke, and setter of six European records this year, has not yet returned to full training but will make a token appearance (probably a fairly swift one too...) in the backstroke events.

Cseh is not alone as taking the meet as a steady way back into things: Laure Manaudou, who lost seven European records this year, relented and decided she would race the short-course after all at the end of a woeful year for the Frenchwoman who in 2007 was on a trajectory to the firmament but fizzled out via an Italian holiday of her own making.

Some teams in Rijeka, such as Britain and Germany, are fielding squads made up largely of developing talent, others, such as Italy, are just about full strength.

It will not be easy – nor desirable – to avoid mentioning the suits.  It will be much more pleasant, of course, to point out the skills, talents, swimmer-coaching relationships that contribute much to performance. Many look forward to a time when the suit counts so little beyond image, comfort, durability, flexibility and those other important factors that the work of all involved in the achievements of athletes and coaches is not unnecessarily diminished. 

The number of world and continental (and national) standards set this year has borrowed too much from the circus and too little from the traditional values of the sport of swimming this year. More relevant to nations trying to access where they fit in the swimming league is to judge how far a national record is behind the best of the continent and the rest of the world. In many cases, swimmers who have taken an axe to their best times in a speedy suit, are not a stroke closer to the podium or the winner. In some extraordinary cases, there are, as one world champion put it “swimmers winning medals who would be out of it altogether if it wasn’t for the suit and the support they’re getting from it”, while there are many obvious examples of swimmers who at the start of 2008 were in line for the Olympic podium but, although they improved on the clock, found themselves overtaken by people who were ranked outside the top 10 and even  top 25 at the dawn of 2008.

Right and proper to look forward to racing in Rijeka. Right and proper too to look forward to a time when technology plays a much more minimal role in a sport that can do without artificial propulsion of any kind, from any source. Right and proper to look forward to a time when contracts and trust and faith between suit makers, coaches and swimmers do not get washed down the gutter, to a time when the swimming world is not so torn apart by events such as those that have dominated the agenda since February 2008. Right and proper to look forward to a time when we don't approach a championship with leading coaches calling for one particular suit or another to be banned because the rule book has failed them and their sport and changed the nature of winning in the pool. Right and proper to look forward to a time when schism is not part of the lexicon of LEN, of FINA, of federations and programmes, of suit makers. 

None of that will happen by turning a blind eye, hoping the problem will go away, denying that there is a problem. Actions speak louder than words and by early next year, LEN, the European nations that form more than a quarter of FINA, should have come to a view on what to do about hi-tech suits and post-Feb 2008 technology. Throughout swimming history, LEN has often led the world of swimming when it has come to innovation, change and response to moments of crisis. There has never been a better time than now for Europe to take a stand. 

Little point in looking back in anger. Or looking back at all - except to lear from mistakes made. What's done is done. The next four days in Rijeka should be celebrated - but when the decorations have been set back in their post-party boxes, resolutions for a better 2009 should be made in earnest by all those who profess to governing a sport that has risked much in the past year. The USA has seen the light, some nine other leading federations have let it be known that they are at one with that movement, Australia will come to a view next week. Is Europe a player too in the leadership of swimming? Has it got the power to make a difference? We will know the answer soon enough. 

2008 has skewed the history of the sport in breadth and depth like no other. Here's a tip-of-the-iceberg snapshot from the helm of the show in one continent [record at start of 2008 in square brackets]:

EUROPEAN RECORDS SET IN 2008

Long-course

MEN

  • 50 free [21.64 Popov RUS]
  • 21.50 Bernard FRA
  • 21.38 Leveaux FRA

  • 100 free [47.84 Vd Hoogenband NED]
  • 47.60 Bernard
  • 47.50 Bernard
  • 47.20 Bernard 

  • 1500m [14:45.94 Sawrymowicz POL]
  • 14:41.13 Prilukov RUS

  • 50m back [24.80 Rupprath GER]
  • 24.47 Tancock GBR

  • 100m back [53.46 Tancock GBR]
  • 53.10 Meeuw GER
  • 53.06 Vyatchanin RUS

  • 200m back [1:55.44 Vyatchanin RUS]
  • 1:54.93 Vyatchanin RUS

  • 100m breast [59.94 Sludnov]
  • 59.76 Dale Oen NOR
  • 59.41 Dale Oen
  • 59.16 Dale Oen

  • 200m breast [2:09.52 Komornikov RUS]
  • 2:08.98 Bossini
  • 2:08.68 Gyurta

  • 50m fly [23.38 Breus UKR]
  • 23.25 Cavic SRB
  • 23.11 Cavic

  • 100 fly [51.36 Serdinov UKR]
  • 50.76 Cavic
  • 50.59 Cavic

  • 200 fly [1:54.62 Esposito FRA]
  • 1:54.38 Korzeniowski POL
  • 1:54.35  Cseh HUN
  • 1:54.31 Skvortsov RUS
  • 1:52.70 Cseh

  • 200 medley [1:56.92 Cseh]
  • 1:56.52 Cseh

  • 400 medley [4:09.63 Cseh]
  • 4:09.59 Cseh
  • 4:07.96 Cseh
  • 4:06.16 Cseh

  • 4x100m free [3:14.04 ITA]
  • 3:12.54 FRA
  • 3:12.36 FRA
  • 3:08.32 FRA

  • 4x200m free [7:09.60 ITA]
  • 7:07.84 ITA
  • 7:03.70 RUS

  • 4x100m medley [3:34.72 RUS]
  • [3:33.62, Germany - LEN says that the German time was never submitted for ratification even though it was clocked in the Olympic final in 2004], so:

  • 3:34.25 RUS
  • 3:33.83 GBR
  • 3:33.59 RUS
  • 3:31.92 RUS

WOMEN

  • 50 free [24.13 De Bruijn NED]
  • 24.09 Veldhuis NED
  • 24.06 Steffen GER

  • 100 free [53.30 Steffen]
  • 53.20 Steffen
  • 53.05 Steffen 

  • 200 free [1:55.52 Manaudou FRA]
  • 1:55.45 Pellegrini ITA
  • 1:54.82 Pellegrini

  • 400 free [4:02.13 Manaudou]
  • 4:01.53 Pellegrini

  • 800 free [8:18.80 Manaudou]
  • 8:18.06 Adlington GBR
  • 8:14.10 Adlington

  • 1500m [15:55.28 Rigamonti]
  • 15:52.84 Filippi ITA

  • 50 back [28.19 Pietsch]
  • 28.17 Jovanovic CRO
  • 28.13 Zhivanevskaya ESP
  • 28.05 Zueva RUS

  • 100 back [59.87 Manaudou]
  • 59.64 Zueva RUS
  • 59.50 Manaudou FRA
  • 59.41 Zueva
  • 59.38 Spofforth GBR
  • 59.05 Spofforth

  • 100 breast [1:07.27 Igelstrom SWE]
  • 1:07.10 Poewe GER
  • 1:07.06 Jukic AUT
  • 1:06.08 Efimova RUS

  • 200 breast [2:24.03 Kovacs HUN]
  • 2:23.79 Nordenstam NOR
  • 2:23.76 Jukic AUT
  • 2:23.02 Nordenstam

  • 400 medley [4:33.59 Klochkova UKR]
  • 4:33.24 Miley GBR

  • 4x100 free [3:35.22 GER]
  • 3:33.62 NED

  • 4x200 free [7:50.82 GER]
  • 7:50.37 FRA
  • 7:49.76 ITA

  • 4x100m medley [4:00.72 GER]
  • 3:59.33 GBR
  • 3:59.14 GBR
  • 3:57.50 GBR

Short-course

MEN

  • 50 free [20.93 Nystrand SWE]
  • 20.81 Draganja CRO

  • 100 free [45.83 Nystrand]
  • 45.69 Bernard

  • 200 free [1:41.89 Hoogenband]
  • 1:40.83 Biedermann GER

  • 400 free [3:37.81 Prilukov]
  • 3:37.35 Prilukov
  • 3:34.98 Biedermann

  • 800 free [7:36.24 Hoffmann]
  • 7:35.24 Biedermann

  • 100 back [50.59 Rupprath]
  • 50.14 Tancock

  • 200 back [1:49.86 Rogan]
  • 1:47.84 Rogan AUT

  • 200 breast [2:05.49 Gyurta]
  • 2:05.02 Giorgetti ITA

  • 50 fly [22.87 Foster GBR]
  • 22.86 Breus
  • 22.64 Dietrich
  • 22.62 Dietrich
  • 22.29 Leveaux

  • 100 fly [50.02 Cavic]
  • 49.74 Korotyshkin RUS

  • 100 medley [52.58 Rupprath]
  • 52.27 Tancock
  • 52.21 Mankoc

  • 4x100m free [3:09.57]
  • [does not count: 3:08.29, CN Marseille, FRA]
  • 3:09.18 NED

  • 4x200 free [7:03.06 GBR]
  • 6:56.52 GBR

  • 4x100 medley [3:28.62 UKR]
  • 3:28.36 RUS
  • 3:24.29 RUS

WOMEN

  • 50 free [23.58 Veldhuis]
  • 23.25 Veldhuis

  • 200 free [1:53.48 Manaudou]
  • 1:53.18 Balmy FRA

  • 800 free [8:11.25 Manaudou]
  • 8:08.25 Adlington

  • 50 back [26.50 Jovanovic]
  • 26.37 Jovanovic 

  • 100 back [57.34 Manaudou]
  • 57.15 Zubkova, Kateryna UKR

  • 200 back [2:04.08 Baron FRA]
  • 2:02.60 Simmonds GBR

  • 50 breast [29.96 Igelstrom]
  • 29.86 Artyemeva RUS

  • 100m breast [1:04.95 Efimova RUS]
  • 1:04.71 Artyemeva 

  • 50 fly [25.33 Kammerling SWE}
  • 25.31 Alshammar SWE

  • 100 medley [59.71 Moravcova SVK]
  • 59.62 Seppala FIN
  • 59.60 Seppala FIN 
  • 59.07 Seppala FIN 

  • 200 medley [2:08.28 Klochkova]
  • 2:07.47 Belmonte ESP

  • 400 medley [4:27.83 Klochkova]
  • 4:27.27 Miley

  • 4x100 free [3:30.85 NED]
  • 3:29.42 NED

  • 4x200 free [7:47.14 GBR]
  • 7:38.90 NED

  • 4x100m medley [3:55.78 SWE]
  • 3:53.02 GBR 

Many thanks to Nick Thierry, SwimNews publisher and world rankings guru for the past 30 years and more, and to PPS Cosmos, Germany, for helping to keep score with me.